ALL-REVI1001 · change_reviewability
Judge whether one change can be reviewed with reasonable confidence.
This is a contextual rule for all languages. Read its implementation.
Definition
Section titled “Definition”Compare stated intent, changed concerns, size, generated portions, tests, risk, rollout, ownership, and possible decomposition. Line count is evidence rather than the verdict.
Evidence
Section titled “Evidence”Findings cite change groups, intent, tests, risk, generated output, and review dependencies.
Exceptions
Section titled “Exceptions”Mechanical migrations may be large when generation and semantic verification are reproducible.
Examples
Section titled “Examples”A feature mixed with unrelated renaming and dependency upgrades is entangled. A generated API
refresh with a reproducible schema diff is mechanical.
References
Section titled “References”- Cites “Google Engineering Practices”, small CLs
- Cites “Software Engineering at Google”, Code Review
- Cites “Best Kept Secrets of Peer Code Review”, code review effectiveness